Skip to main content

Select to view content by GCM objective

1 - Datos

2 - Minimizar factores adversos

3 - Proporcionar información

4 - Identidad jurídica y documentación

5 - Vías de migración regular

6 - Contratación y trabajo decente

7 - Reducir vulnerabilidades

8 - Salvar vidas

9 - Combatir el tráfico de migrantes

10 - Erradicar la trata de personas

11 - Gestión de fronteras

12 - Verificación de antecedentes y derivación

13 - Alternativas a la detención

14 - Protección consular

15 - Acceso a los servicios básicos

16 - Inclusión y cohesión social

17 - Eliminar la discriminación

18 - Desarrollo y reconocimiento de competencias

19 - Contribución de migrantes y diásporas

20 - Remesas

21 - Retorno y reintegración dignos

22 - Protección social

23 - Cooperación internacional

General

Select to view content by GCM guiding principle

Centrada en las personas

Cooperación internacional

Soberanía nacional

Estado de derecho y garantías procesales

Desarrollo sostenible

Derechos humanos

Perspectiva de género

Perspectiva infantil

Enfoque pangubernamental

Enfoque pansocial

Alcance geográfico global

Select to view content by region

Africa

Américas

Asia

Europa

Oceanía

Select to view content by country

Afganistán

Albania

Argelia

Andorra

Angola

Antigua y Barbuda

Argentina

Armenia

Australia

Austria

Azerbaiyán

Bahamas, The

Bahrein

Bangladesh

Barbados

Belarús

Bélgica

Belice

Benin

Bhután

Bolivia (Estado Plurinacional de)

Bosnia y Herzegovina

Botswana

Brasil

Brunei Darussalam

Bulgaria

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Cabo Verde

Camboya

Camerún

Canadá

República Centroafricana

Chad

Chile

China

Colombia

Comoras

Congo

Costa Rica

Côte d’Ivoire

Croacia

Cuba

Chipre

Chequia

República Democrática del Congo

Dinamarca

Djibouti

Dominica

República Dominicana

Ecuador

Egipto

El Salvador

Guinea Ecuatorial

Eritrea

Estonia

Eswatini

Etiopía

Fiji

Finlandia

Francia

Gabón

Gambia

Georgia

Alemania

Ghana

Global

Grecia

Granada

Guatemala

Guinea

Guinea-Bissau

Guyana

Haití

Honduras

Hungría

Islandia

India

Indonesia

Irán (República Islámica del)

Iraq

Irlanda

Israel

Italia

Jamaica

Japón

Jordania

Kazajstán

Kenya

Kiribati

República Popular Democrática de Corea

República de Corea

Kosovo*

Kuwait

Kirguistán

República Democrática Popular Lao

Letonia

Líbano

Lesotho

Liberia

Libya

Liechtenstein

Lituania

Luxemburgo

Madagascar

Malawi

Malasia

Maldivasa

Malí

Malta

Islas Marshall

Mauritania

Mauricio

México

Micronesia (Estados Federados de)

Mónaco

Mongolia

Montenegro

Marruecos

Mozambique

Myanmar

Namibia

Nauru

Nepal

Países Bajos

Nueva Zelandia

Nicaragua

Níger

Nigeria

Macedonia del Norte

Noruega

Omán

Pakistán

Palau

Panamá

Papua Nueva Guinea

Paraguay

Perú

Filipinas

Polonia

Portugal

Qatar

República de Moldova

Rumania

Federación de Rusia

Rwanda

Saint Kitts y Nevis

Santa Lucía

San Vicente y las Granadinas

Samoa

San Marino

Santo Tomé y Príncipe

Arabia Saudita

Senegal

Serbia

Seychelles

Sierra Leona

Singapur

San Martín (parte Holandesa)

Eslovaquia

Eslovenia

Islas Salomón

Somalia

Sudáfrica

Sudán del Sur

España

Sri Lanka

Sudán

Suriname

Suecia

Suiza

República Árabe Siria

Tayikistán

República Unida de Tanzanía

Tailandia

Timor-Leste

Togo

Tonga

Trinidad y Tabago

Túnez

Türkiye

Turkmenistán

Tuvalu

Uganda

Ucrania

Emiratos Árabes Unidos

Reino Unido de Gran Bretaña e Irlanda del Norte

Estados Unidos de América

Uruguay

Uzbekistán

Vanuatu

Venezuela (República Bolivariana de)

Viet Nam

Yemen

Zambia

Zimbabwe

Volver a los resultados

Select by type of document

Analysis

E-learning course

Guidelines/Toolkits/Manuals

Journal Article

Methodology

Link

Policy Brief

Report

Resolution

Training / Workshop Material

Working Paper

Other

Documentos

Much of the recent debate on immigration to Europe has focused on how many refugees should be allowed to enter and how refugees should be distributed among EU member states, but there has been less academic focus on under what conditions, if any, human smuggling is morally permissible.
Date of publication:
28 September 2018
Information Type:
This contribution constitutes an attempt to critically rethink the framework present in everyday narratives of irregular migration facilitation.
Date of publication:
08 August 2018
Information Type:
This academic article is a case study of the Norwegian government’s ‘Stricter Asylum Regulations in Norway’ campaign on Facebook, exploring the opportunities and challenges involved in communication campaigns directed at migrants in a potentially vulnerable situation.
Date of publication:
30 July 2018
Information Type:
Starting from the basis of the push-pull theory, this article elaborates on an overview of macro-, meso-, and micro-factors that act together to inform the migrant’s individual decision to migrate.
Date of publication:
20 July 2018
Information Type:
This blog discusses the potential of Blockchain to offer cost-efficiency, transparency and accountability in migration and asylum programmes.
Date of publication:
22 February 2018
Source:
Information Type:
For decades, mobility between the Sahel and northern Africa was mostly irregular, but not clandestine. Most of the border crossings were supervised and (illegally) taxed by border police; everyone knew who did what with whom, and Saharan drivers were not thought of as smugglers of people.
Date of publication:
21 February 2018
Source:
Information Type:
In this paper, it is argued that remigration is not a valid indicator to measure sustainable return.
Date of publication:
22 August 2017
Information Type:
Based on 324 in-depth interviews with Indian, Moroccan, Ukrainian, Bosnian and Filipino migrants based in four EU countries (Austria, Italy, Spain and the UK), this paper explores the relationship between social remittances and transnational mobility.
Date of publication:
28 November 2016
Information Type:
The term “social remittances” was coined over fifteen years ago to capture the notion that, in addition to money, migration also entails the circulation of ideas, practices, skills, identities, and social capital also circulate between sending and receiving communities.
Date of publication:
03 November 2016
Source:
Information Type:
This paper in the journal Foundations of International Migration Law reviews the sources of international legal norms that govern migration by examining treaty law, customary law and general principles of law.
Date of publication:
16 November 2012
Information Type:
In this article, the concept of social remittances is revisted. First, the authors show how people's experiences before migrating strongly influence what they do in the countries where they settle; this, in turn, affects what they remit back to their homelands.
Date of publication:
05 November 2010
Information Type:

About the Migration Network Hub

What is the Migration Network Hub?

The Hub is a virtual “meeting space” where governments, stakeholders and experts can access and share migration-related information and services. It provides curated content, analysis and information on a variety of topics.

The Hub aims to support UN Member States in the implementation, follow-up and review of the Global Compact for Migration by serving as a repository of existing evidence, practices and initiatives, and facilitating access to knowledge sharing via online discussions, an expert database and demand-driven, tailor-made solutions (launching in 2021).

What content is displayed in the Hub?

The Hub aims to help you find information on migration, ranging from policy briefs and journal articles, existing portals and platforms and what they offer, to infographics and videos. The different types of resources submitted by users undergo peer review by a panel of experts from within the UN and beyond, before being approved for inclusion in the Hub. To provide guidance to users based on findings of the needs assessment, the content is ordered so that more comprehensive and global resources are shown before more specific and regional ones. Know a great resource? Please submit using the links above and your suggestion will be reviewed. Please see the draft criteria for existing practices here.

Apply to join the Peer Review Roster

Content submitted to the Migration Network Hub is first peer reviewed by experts in the field from both the UN and beyond. Applications are welcomed to join the roster on an ongoing basis. Learn more here.

Apply Now

Contact us

We welcome your feedback and suggestions, please contact us

*Todas las referencias a Kosovo deben entenderse en el contexto de la Resolución 1244 [1999] del Consejo de Seguridad de las Naciones Unidas.